2017 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icedss.2017.8073677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different image preprocessing methods used for retinal fundus images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the adaptive median filter has the best performance in salt & paper noise and the adaptive filter has the best performance for Gaussian noise, but their performance is close to each other, based on our fundus image (6) database noise. The results showed that the adaptive median filter has the best performance compared to other filters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the adaptive median filter has the best performance in salt & paper noise and the adaptive filter has the best performance for Gaussian noise, but their performance is close to each other, based on our fundus image (6) database noise. The results showed that the adaptive median filter has the best performance compared to other filters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Noise in an image is undesirable to us as it disrupts and degrades the quality of the image. Noise removal is always a difficult task so as edge preservation when the intensity of the disrupted noise in the original image is high [4], as authors in [5] represents a comparison of different methods used for pre-processing in retinal fundus images and discussed principles, advantages and disadvantages, Here adaptive median filter is found to be better compared to other preprocessing methods, because it have higher PSNR value and lower MSE value in 3 diabetic retinopathy retinal images, and authors in [6], [7] at HRT database and [8] used the median filter for noise removed in fundus retinal images. But the authors at [9] proposed denoising method based on image sequences and an adaptive frame averaging approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise Removal [44] Many denoising algorithms like Gaussian filters, median filters, non-local means denoising, etc. are utilized for removing unwanted noise.…”
Section: Colour Space Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma das principais etapas do pré-processamento é a remoc ¸ão dos ruídos, que são categorizados como: ruído de sal e pimenta (ocorre aleatoriedade do pixel preto e branco); ruído gaussiano (ocorre variac ¸ão do valor da intensidade com a distribuic ¸ão normal de gaussion); e ruído de cintilac ¸ão (contém pixels brancos aleatórios) [Swathi et al 2017]. Outras etapas importantes são o aprimoramento de contraste, correc ¸ão de tonalidade e redimensionamento [Chatterjee et al 2021].…”
Section: Pré-processamento De Imagens De Retinasunclassified
“…O algoritmo de método não linear, por sua vez, aplica o filtro definindo qual pixel está corrompido ou não corrompido. O filtro não linear produz melhor resultado em comparac ¸ão com o filtro linear [Swathi et al 2017].…”
Section: Pré-processamento De Imagens De Retinasunclassified