2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-4230(99)00061-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different methods for estimating TMRad from dynamic DSC measurements with ADT 24 values obtained from adiabatic Dewar experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adiabatic induction time is defined as the time which is needed for self-heating of the sample from the starting temperature to the time of maximum rate (TMR ad ). The precise determination of the time to maximum rate under adiabatic conditions is necessary for the safety analysis of many technological processes [7][8].…”
Section: Kinetics At Tones Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adiabatic induction time is defined as the time which is needed for self-heating of the sample from the starting temperature to the time of maximum rate (TMR ad ). The precise determination of the time to maximum rate under adiabatic conditions is necessary for the safety analysis of many technological processes [7][8].…”
Section: Kinetics At Tones Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, a typical DSC scanning thermogram of ANP. Moreover, time to maximum rate under adiabatic condition, TMR ad , can be calculated by [30][31][32] …”
Section: Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…primary runaway hazard due to exothermicity of reaction and secondary runaway hazard due to release of dangerous chemicals from reactor to the surroundings. The primary runaway hazard assessment is based on criticality classes (Stoessel, 1993), probability (time to maximum rate at adiabatic conditions (TMR ad )) and severity (adiabatic temperature rise (DT ad )) (Keller, Stark, Fierz, Heinzle, & Hungerbühler, 1997;Pastre, Wörsdörfer, Keller, & Hungerbühler, 2000) (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: Batch/semi-batch Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%