2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2008.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different methods for simulating the effect of specular ion reflection on microtrenching during dry etching of polysilicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These deviations could stem from (i) ion implanting and subsequent target surface swelling, and (ii) amorphization and therefore altered sputter yield [33]. So far, IonShaper R does not take into account these effects, but there are already successful developments to tackle this problem [34,35].…”
Section: D Cross-sectional Shape Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deviations could stem from (i) ion implanting and subsequent target surface swelling, and (ii) amorphization and therefore altered sputter yield [33]. So far, IonShaper R does not take into account these effects, but there are already successful developments to tackle this problem [34,35].…”
Section: D Cross-sectional Shape Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the flux distributions themselves depend on the coverages, since the effective sticking probabilities usually depend on the fraction of free surface sites. For example, the effective sticking probability in [4] is modeled by ( )…”
Section: Surface Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more promising approach is based on the Monte Carlo method. By simulating many particle trajectories the surface rates can be determined (3,4). Compared to common techniques, where the particle transport equation is solved conventionally by integration over the surface, the Monte Carlo method allows the solution of more complex transport equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various combinations of methods to handle both tasks in three-dimensions are discussed in [1]. A new combination using the level set method for surface representation and a Monte Carlo method for flux calculation was recently reported [2], [3]. In the following we describe techniques which enable topography simulations of large three-dimensional geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%