2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-44282-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Metrics of Belt Condition Used in Lignite Mines for Taking Decision About Belt Segments Replacement and Refurbishment

Leszek Jurdziak,
Ryszard Błażej,
Agata Kirjanów-Błażej
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional measures, such as total working time, are not ideal for assessing the degree of belt wear. In the study [22], new relative measures were introduced, defined as longitudinal (𝐸𝑋 𝑋 ) and transverse (𝐸𝑋 𝑌 ) extent, to enhance the detection of critical threats. The focus was on the transverse extent, as it plays a crucial role in evaluating tensile strength in the area of damage concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional measures, such as total working time, are not ideal for assessing the degree of belt wear. In the study [22], new relative measures were introduced, defined as longitudinal (𝐸𝑋 𝑋 ) and transverse (𝐸𝑋 𝑌 ) extent, to enhance the detection of critical threats. The focus was on the transverse extent, as it plays a crucial role in evaluating tensile strength in the area of damage concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional measure of assessing the technical condition of belts used in the mine, primarily relying on the calendar life of the belt, proved to be significantly less effective compared to the DiagBelt+ system [22]. Relying on visual inspection of belt covers and information about the age of the belt often led to directing belts to refurbishment that were, in reality, in good technical condition and could continue to operate.…”
Section: Diagbelt+ Diagnostic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%