1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00490-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different models of substrate and product inhibition in anaerobic digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (a)). The morphology was similar with the results of Yang et al 19) in fluidized bed reactor and Aguilar et al 16) in CSTR with acetate as sole organic substrate, and resembled with the findings of Uemura and Harada 20) in thermophilic UASB and Mösche and Jördening 21) in fluidized bed reactor with acetate as main substrate. The microscopic observation was also in agreement with the morphological descriptions of these two kinds of methanogens by Lange and Ahring 22) .…”
Section: Morphology Of Acetate and Propionate Pregrown Inoculasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 (a)). The morphology was similar with the results of Yang et al 19) in fluidized bed reactor and Aguilar et al 16) in CSTR with acetate as sole organic substrate, and resembled with the findings of Uemura and Harada 20) in thermophilic UASB and Mösche and Jördening 21) in fluidized bed reactor with acetate as main substrate. The microscopic observation was also in agreement with the morphological descriptions of these two kinds of methanogens by Lange and Ahring 22) .…”
Section: Morphology Of Acetate and Propionate Pregrown Inoculasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Fig. 2(a), it was observed that propionate degradation started only when initial acetate was almost completely degraded, which was in agreement with the results of Öztürk 23) in the first feeding treatment of acetate, propionate and butyrate mixtures with molasses-pregrown inocula and the results of Mösche and Jördening 21) in treating the acetate and propionate mixtures with anaerobic sludge from a sugar factory wastewater treatment plant.…”
Section: Morphology Of Acetate and Propionate Pregrown Inoculasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With acetate being a degradation product of other VFAs it is possible that the high concentrations of acetate in the period following the oleate addition could have caused a product inhibition resulting in a further increase in concentration and recovery time of other VFAs. Acetate is known to inhibit butyrate degradation at a concentration of 25 mM (Ahring and Westermann, 1988) and product inhibition of isovalerate and propionate degradation by acetate has been demonstrated as well (Mösche and Jördening, 1999;Pind et al, 2003). On the other hand propionate began to decrease 1-3 days after acetate had decreased and reached a stable level, which indicates that the syntrophic acetogens degrading propionate was more affected by the oleate pulses than the acetotrophic methanogens.…”
Section: Effect Of Oleate Pulses On the Biogas Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, over the long-term, organic matter in the hay-rich bioreactors appeared to be degrading 2-3 times as fast as that in the wood-rich bioreactors. limits the rate of its production through product inhibition, which has been reported for anaerobic digestion [41]. After propionate drops to low concentrations at Port 3, propionate-producing fermenters appear to reinvigorate as suggested by the increases in propionate concentration towards the effluent port.…”
Section: Organic Matter Degradationmentioning
confidence: 84%