2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different optimization based land reallocation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors such as climate, topography, soil, hydrology, land management conditions, as well as socioeconomic aspects, are often selected [27,28], and a wide range of methods have been developed, including Multi-criterion evaluation (MCE) [29][30][31], analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [32,33], Storie index (SI) [34], rule-based classification method [35,36], etc., for land evaluation. In terms of research methods, the related research has used multi-objective programming model (MOP) [37], cellular automata (CA) [38], comparative advantage index [39], agent-based model (ABM) [40], and multiple optimization algorithms [41][42][43] to optimize land use layout in terms of quantitative structure, spatial pattern, and benefit optimization. However, the planting suitability of food crops and the spatial structure relationship between crops, as well as the reasonable matching of natural and human factors of cultivated land use for different food crops have not received sufficient attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as climate, topography, soil, hydrology, land management conditions, as well as socioeconomic aspects, are often selected [27,28], and a wide range of methods have been developed, including Multi-criterion evaluation (MCE) [29][30][31], analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [32,33], Storie index (SI) [34], rule-based classification method [35,36], etc., for land evaluation. In terms of research methods, the related research has used multi-objective programming model (MOP) [37], cellular automata (CA) [38], comparative advantage index [39], agent-based model (ABM) [40], and multiple optimization algorithms [41][42][43] to optimize land use layout in terms of quantitative structure, spatial pattern, and benefit optimization. However, the planting suitability of food crops and the spatial structure relationship between crops, as well as the reasonable matching of natural and human factors of cultivated land use for different food crops have not received sufficient attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike ESV, suitability is an objective with spatial properties that can be used to analyze the ecological status [12]. In addition, compactness is also a spatial objective for allocation to enhance urban intensification and social equality [49,50], which have been shown to be in conflict with suitability objectives [51]. To facilitate the optimization process, the whole region is rasterized into I rows and J columns, with a total of 509 × 417 = 212,253 cells, each with an area of 1 km 2 in size.…”
Section: Land Use Optimization Model Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were found to be useful and acceptable according to interviews with farmers. Furthermore, artificial intelligence-based optimization algorithms have recently been developed, including fuzzy logic (Cay & Iscan, 2011;Ertunç et al, 2018), analytical hierarchy (Cay & Uyan, 2013), genetic algorithm (Akkus et al, 2012;Haklı et al, 2016Haklı et al, , 2018, and migrating birds/simulated annealing (Uyan et al, 2020), which can apply both stages of block-reallocation separately or together. Moreover, a model based on the ABC algorithm, which was designed to be a powerful tool for nonlinear and complex problems in a land reallocation project, was proposed for the first time ( _ Inceyol & Özbeyaz, 2016).…”
Section: Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%