2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different performance recovery procedures for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can recover the reversible losses during the dynamic load cycle, which facilitates a more accurate assessment of the actual performance losses of MEAs. The main recovery mechanism is as follows: (1) remove excess water, hydrogen, and air; (2) CO poisoning elimination in ACL; (3) Pt oxides reduction in CCL; (4) sulfate anions removal; and (5) regeneration/hydration of the ionomer . After 96 h of AST, the performance retention rates of GO- μg/cm 2 and GO-1 μg/cm 2 are 89.6 and 96.2% at 0.6 V, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can recover the reversible losses during the dynamic load cycle, which facilitates a more accurate assessment of the actual performance losses of MEAs. The main recovery mechanism is as follows: (1) remove excess water, hydrogen, and air; (2) CO poisoning elimination in ACL; (3) Pt oxides reduction in CCL; (4) sulfate anions removal; and (5) regeneration/hydration of the ionomer . After 96 h of AST, the performance retention rates of GO- μg/cm 2 and GO-1 μg/cm 2 are 89.6 and 96.2% at 0.6 V, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each work period includes an FC-DLC and an electrochemical property test, including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), polarization curves, cyclic voltammograms (CVs), local current density distribution (LCD), and oxygen transport resistance (OTR) measurements before and after the AST. This evaluation method is derived from the previous work of Zhang et al, 37 which can more accurately evaluate the irreversible performance loss of MEA during durability testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irreversible loss in the performance of single cells can be related to the dissolution of the catalyst nanoparticles, carbon corrosion, membrane shrinkage, and nanoparticle agglomeration. [ 87 ] On the other hand, the formation of PtO, fuel impurities, water flooding, ionomer contamination, and adsorption of impurities at the catalyst surface lead to reversible losses, as they can be reversed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating conditions of PEMFC [5], its flow field [6], and the optimization of properties of cells [5] have all been investigated. Modified catalysts [7], the properties of the Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL) [8], the clamping pressure of cells [9], degradation [10], hydrogen economy [11] were also studied. The investigations unveiled the behaviour of PEMFC at different conditions.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%