Comparison of Different Solutions for a Seismic and Energy Retrofit of an Auditorium

Abstract

The increasing attention paid to climate change has boosted scientific research in the matter of energy refurbishment of existing public buildings. However, the design of the intervention must be integrated with structural upgrading when the constructions are located in seismic zones. Indeed, in Italy, as in other seismically active countries, the structural damage, observed after earthquakes, underlines the increase in economic losses for buildings retrofitted only for energy saving. In this framework, the paper introduces an integrated approach for selecting retrofit actions aimed at improving both the seismic and energy performance, starting from a detailed in situ analysis with which dynamic energy and structural simulation models are constructed. The case study is an auditorium erected in 1982 with a reinforced concrete structure inside a masonry ring wall of an ancient building. A step-by-step analysis of each component role in the structural and energy performance of the building is proposed. The results indicate that the proposed approach can help to determine the best technical solution, and the integrated design leads to saving 10% of the cost of the works.

Deformation Capacity of RC Beam-Column Joints Strengthened with Ferrocement

“…Generally, the beam-column joint experiences a brittle shear failure. Therefore, efforts are needed to strengthen the structures that were built in the 70s and 80s for their sustainability [16][17][18][19]. Several structural strengthening methods have been proposed to withstand seismic loads.…”

Use of Engineered Wood for the Retrofitting of Existing Structures

“…Schemes 1 and 3 best represent the parasitic dependence of the "host" structure. The new configuration of the building, according to the Italian standard NTC 2018 [14], is subject to global verification mainly due to the load increase on the original structure [15], [16]. The increase in masses, the "new" centre of gravity and of stiffnesses and the "new" shape ratios impose a modification of the seismic behaviour, however.…”