2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different standards for real-time PCR-based absolute quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliable standards are essential in qPCR analysis. Therefore, we selected a cloned circular plasmid, which is more stable than PCR products (20). The four miRNAs (miR-21, miR-31, miR-96 and miR-135b) and U6 snRNA from the HT29 cells were reversetranscribed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable standards are essential in qPCR analysis. Therefore, we selected a cloned circular plasmid, which is more stable than PCR products (20). The four miRNAs (miR-21, miR-31, miR-96 and miR-135b) and U6 snRNA from the HT29 cells were reversetranscribed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaction mixtures and PCR conditions are described in Epelde et al (2014). Standards were made from plasmids containing the target sequence (Dhanasekaran et al, 2010).…”
Section: Presence Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis was conducted using TaqMan primer probe sets with quantification relative to a standard curve of the gene copy number (28).…”
Section: Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%