2010
DOI: 10.2747/1548-1603.47.1.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Digital Image Processing Techniques for Classifying Arctic Tundra

Abstract: The arctic tundra vegetation classified in the study area, Toolik Lake Field Station, Alaska, was relatively small in stature (with varying species growing in clusters) and must therefore be placed in different communities. This study compared different digital image processing classification techniques, including unsupervised, supervised (using spectral and spatial features), and expert systems. The dataset was a pan-sharpened 5 × 5 meter spatial resolution SPOT image. Accuracy assessments based on field insp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the adequacy of the classification method utilizing grayscale imagery, the classification derived for the modern image of the spatially heterogeneous Barrow landscape was compared to classifications derived from the same satellite image using multiple spectral bands. The latter classification derived from the multispectral image has been shown to have a high level of accuracy compared to similar studies in the arctic (Muller et al 1999, Jorgenson et al 1994, Noyle 1999, Stine et al 2010, Chaudhuri 2008 with an overall user and producer accuracy of 74% and 88% respectively . When we compared the classification derived from the grayscale classification described above with the classification derived from the same but multispectral image, the grayscale classification had an overall accuracy of 98.58% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.97, suggesting it adequately represented the extant land cover of the landscape and that this is an acceptable method for classifying spatially heterogeneous tundra landscapes such as those in this study.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To test the adequacy of the classification method utilizing grayscale imagery, the classification derived for the modern image of the spatially heterogeneous Barrow landscape was compared to classifications derived from the same satellite image using multiple spectral bands. The latter classification derived from the multispectral image has been shown to have a high level of accuracy compared to similar studies in the arctic (Muller et al 1999, Jorgenson et al 1994, Noyle 1999, Stine et al 2010, Chaudhuri 2008 with an overall user and producer accuracy of 74% and 88% respectively . When we compared the classification derived from the grayscale classification described above with the classification derived from the same but multispectral image, the grayscale classification had an overall accuracy of 98.58% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.97, suggesting it adequately represented the extant land cover of the landscape and that this is an acceptable method for classifying spatially heterogeneous tundra landscapes such as those in this study.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The extent of these misclassifications represented <1% of the study area, thus not compromising the use of the final map for identifying wildlife habitats and selecting monitoring sites. The confusion between shadowed areas and water is recurrent in classification studies performed at high resolution [7,48,142], as water shares similar spectral characteristics as shadows [142]. Even creating an additional class for shadow in the classification (instead of creating a shadow layer using a hillshade) did not solve the problem as there were several water areas classified as shadow and vice versa (results not shown).…”
Section: Classification Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies evaluate the final map visually to assess classification performance [1,7], others only rely on accuracy metrics [44,48]. We consider visual evaluation of the final classified map as a critical addition to accuracy metrics.…”
Section: Classification Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As field conditions described by Walker et al (1994), Snowbeds occur over gentle north facing slopes. The NDVI and spectral value ranges observed for Snowbed complexes in Stine et al (2010) were adopted and modified for this study. Using these criteria, rules were developed in the Knowledge Engineer available with ERDAS Imagine (Appendix B, Figure 5).…”
Section: Derivation Of Landscape Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%