2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct boiling method with commercial kits for extracting fecal microbiome DNA by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from mucosal samples using the DNA MAGNETICS and EXTRACT kit (Shenzhen BioEAsy Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., China), according to the manufacturer's instruction as previously validated (Peng et al, 2013). The barcoded V4F-GAGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and V4R-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT primers were used to amplify bacterial 16S rRNA V4 fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from mucosal samples using the DNA MAGNETICS and EXTRACT kit (Shenzhen BioEAsy Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., China), according to the manufacturer's instruction as previously validated (Peng et al, 2013). The barcoded V4F-GAGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and V4R-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT primers were used to amplify bacterial 16S rRNA V4 fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] DNA concentrations were measured with a NanoDrop 2000 Bioanalyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA). Samples were stored at −20 °C before qRT-PCR assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variations in the resultant microbial profiles in different studies due to methodological disparities make comparisons difficult and not very meaningful (Mai and Draganov, 2009). Although the results of a few studies available to date have shown no significant effects of different DNA extraction methods on the resultant bacterial profiles of biological samples (Peng et al, 2013, Wagner Mackenzie et al, 2015, a number of workers have recognised and called for a consensus and a universal DNA extraction method for microbiome analyses to overcome the challenges and misrepresentation inherent in using disparate techniques (Abusleme et al, 2014, Claassen et al, 2013, Henderson et al, 2013, Kennedy et al, 2014, Lazarevic et al, 2013, Maukonen et al, 2012, Walker et al, 2015, Yuan et al, 2012.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%