2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct fluorescent antibody staining and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for the detection of novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in nasopharyngeal samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological methods are much faster and less costly than viral culture methods, but may have a lower sensitivity and specificity compared with the culture methods described above. Immunofluorescence tests (IF), which enable the identification of antigens of a specific type of influenza virus in clinical samples are used frequently (Kapelusznik et al, 2009;Berg et al, 2011;). The method utilizes specific antibody labeled with a fluorescent dye such as fluorescein which binds to a particular antigen of influenza virus type A or B.…”
Section: Methods For Detection Of Influenza Virus Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological methods are much faster and less costly than viral culture methods, but may have a lower sensitivity and specificity compared with the culture methods described above. Immunofluorescence tests (IF), which enable the identification of antigens of a specific type of influenza virus in clinical samples are used frequently (Kapelusznik et al, 2009;Berg et al, 2011;). The method utilizes specific antibody labeled with a fluorescent dye such as fluorescein which binds to a particular antigen of influenza virus type A or B.…”
Section: Methods For Detection Of Influenza Virus Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%