2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.riam.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct microscopy, culture and calcofluor white for the diagnosis of onychomycosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In several previous reports that compared fluorescent methods using CFW and KOH for the diagnosis of onychomycosis, CFW did not have a much better result. Bonifaz et al summarised 33 suspected onychomycosis cases, and the positive rates of CFW and KOH were 57.88% and 66.67%, respectively, which showed a lower result using CFW method. Weinberg et al evaluated 105 suspected onychomycosis cases, and the CFW method showed a 72% positive rate, and the KOH method showed a 60% positive rate, which showed that CFW method was only a little higher than KOH method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In several previous reports that compared fluorescent methods using CFW and KOH for the diagnosis of onychomycosis, CFW did not have a much better result. Bonifaz et al summarised 33 suspected onychomycosis cases, and the positive rates of CFW and KOH were 57.88% and 66.67%, respectively, which showed a lower result using CFW method. Weinberg et al evaluated 105 suspected onychomycosis cases, and the CFW method showed a 72% positive rate, and the KOH method showed a 60% positive rate, which showed that CFW method was only a little higher than KOH method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescent method using CFW (calcofluor white) is a simple, rapid, highly efficient direct microscopy method that has a higher positive detection rate compared with KOH in various superficial fungal infectious diseases . Several studies have compared CFW and other methods to diagnose suspected onychomycosis, but they did not show much better results with CFW . Besides, the biggest disadvantages of CFW are that it diminishes quickly and its relatively bright background, but no alternative fluorescent reagents have been developed and used in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the direct application of PCR‐based methods in clinical samples would allow early and specific diagnosis of fungal diseases and identification of the causative agents . Meanwhile, prior studies have suggested that direct microscopy using fluorescence may be a sensitive technique, which could increase detection rates by 4–22% compared with KOH in the diagnosis of fungal infections …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Meanwhile, prior studies have suggested that direct microscopy using fluorescence may be a sensitive technique, which could increase detection rates by 4-22% compared with KOH in the diagnosis of fungal infections. [5][6][7] A limited number of studies have compared molecular diagnoses and conventional culture in the identification of clinical isolates for the diagnosis of onychomycosis, and most immunofluorescence studies have focused on deep fungal infections and the lack data of onychomycosis. Herein, we present the results of fungal fluorescent staining and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) PCR-based sequencing compared with conventional methods (microscopy of KOH mount and culture) for the diagnosis of onychomycosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%