Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota

Abstract

Aim: As a prelude to long‐term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. Methods and Results: Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen Easy‐DNA Kit extraction method for large samples yielded over eight times more DNA than any other method (3144 ± 873 μg g−1 of sample, P < 0·05). Bacterial and fungal species richness was estimated by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis. The Invitrogen Easy‐DNA Kit generated the greatest bacterial species richness (46 ± 7 peaks) while Bio‐Rad Aquapure yielded the highest fungal species richness (71 ± 9·5 peaks). Conclusion: Cluster analysis indicated different DNA extraction methods generated different microbial community compositions using the same cecal matrix from a single donor bird. Significance and Impact of the Study: Optimized DNA extraction protocols Invitrogen Easy‐DNA Kit extraction method for large samples and Bio‐Rad Aquapure outperform other methods for extraction of DNA from poultry fecal samples, although these methods do not necessarily recover all available DNA. They will be used in future studies to monitor the dynamics of microbial communities of the avian ceca.

Microbial Diversity and Host-Specific Sequences of Canada Goose Feces

“…This finding is relevant to source tracking, as sequences from "Bacteroidetes" are often used to develop hostspecific assays. However, it should be noted that "Bacteroidetes" have been found to be abundant in the gastrointestinal tract of turkeys (31). While at the bacterial class level, the compositions of the microbial communities in feces from Canada geese are similar to those in feces from other avian species, there were some differences at the species level.…”

“…To further understand the avian fecal microbial community, the sequences obtained in this study were compared to published data from 16S rRNA gene fecal and intestinal clone libraries from gulls (26), chickens (14,23,24,39), and turkeys (27,31) (Table 2). A total of 11 classes (22 orders) were identified.…”

Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench)

“…It is unclear from these findings, whether there is a relationship between plant mDNA yield and the diversity of endophytic bacteria retrieved. However, Scupham et al (2007) and Salonen et al (2010) have argued that DNA yield or purity was not always correlated to the diversity of communities retrieved, but that it was directly influenced by the lysis step of an extraction protocol. Robust lytic processes (e.g.…”

Molecular tools reveal diets of insectivorous birds from predator fecal matter

“…Besides sequencing methodology, recent studies have expanded upon prey identification techniques to compare predator diet breadth and composition over time and across different habitats Razgour et al 2011). Further applications include revealing the prey of locally threatened species (Murray et al 2011), identifying natural predators of an economically important pest (Smith et al 2011), characterizing the microbial communities within the predators themselves (Scupham et al 2007), and quantifying prey consumption via real-time PCR techniques (Bowles et al 2011). Besides arthropod prey, molecular techniques were used to tease apart plant diets of herbivores via fecal samples enabling the separation of foraging niches (Corse et al 2010;Valentini et al 2009).…”