2021
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2020-0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Samples from Old Blood Collections

Abstract: In this study, DNA was extracted from whole blood which had been collected and stored at -20°C for 5–18 years, with the aim of determining the most suitable commercial DNA extraction kit for this purpose. DNA from nine cord blood samples collected in 1999, 2001 and 2012, with low blood volumes (<1 ml), and a partly dried adult blood sample collected in 2003, having a large blood volume (6 ml) was extracted using four different DNA extraction kits: Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit, DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, whole blood samples were collected from patients and kept frozen at -20°C for six months. While fresh samples are producing better results, it is not unusual to produce high-quality DNA isolated from samples that have been stored for several years (Tagliaferro et al, 2021). Also, QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit that was used in the present study is best valued for its time-effectiveness, lower possibility of sample contamination and ease of use (Chacon-Cortes & Griffiths, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, whole blood samples were collected from patients and kept frozen at -20°C for six months. While fresh samples are producing better results, it is not unusual to produce high-quality DNA isolated from samples that have been stored for several years (Tagliaferro et al, 2021). Also, QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit that was used in the present study is best valued for its time-effectiveness, lower possibility of sample contamination and ease of use (Chacon-Cortes & Griffiths, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous research has shown that for older samples, other DNA extraction methods, such as modified salting-out method, should be used (Mardan-Nik et al, 2019). Other studies have shown that silica-based DNA isolation using commercial kits, such as QIAamp® DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen) (Mardan-Nik et al, 2019) and DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) (Tagliaferro et al, 2021) are both capable of producing high-quality DNA extracts suitable for subsequent PCR amplification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that frozen BCCs were used in most of the studies, while commercial DNA extraction kits are routinely used for fresh samples. 27 Frozen BCCs were thawed at 4°C, room temperature, 37°C, 55°C, and 65°C before DNA extraction in previous studies. 1,7,8,10,28,29 We explored three thawing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, EV‐DNA isolation methods are not standardized, and are based on either commercially available kits (i.e. silica filtration and magnetic beads‐based approach) or phenol chloroform method which can affect isolation efficiency and DNA fragment size (Sorber et al., 2017; Tagliaferro et al., 2021). Downstream analysis methods were also reported, such as Qubit fluorometer, nanodrop, Agilent bioanalyzer and qPCR, which present different levels of sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%