Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties

Abstract

This paper presents guidelines for the calibration of radiation beams that were issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS 398), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG 51) and the German task group (DIN 6800-2). These protocols are based on the use of an ionization chamber calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in a standard laboratory’s reference quality beam, where the previous protocols were based on air kerma standards. This study aims to determine uncertainties in dosimetry for electron beam radiotherapy using internationally established high-energy radiotherapy beam calibration standards. Methods: Dw was determined in 6-, 12- and 18 MeV electron energies under reference conditions using three cylindrical and two plane-parallel ion chambers in concert with the IAEA TRS 398, AAPM TG 51 and DIN 6800-2 absorbed dose protocols. From mean measured Dw values, the ratio TRS 398/TG 51 was found to vary between 0.988 and 1.004, while for the counterpart TRS 398/DIN 6800-2 and TG 51/DIN 6800-2, the variation ranges were 0.991–1.003 and 0.997–1.005, respectively. For the cylindrical chambers, the relative combined uncertainty (k = 1) in absorbed dose measurements was 1.44%, while for the plane-parallel chambers, it ranged from 1.53 to 1.88%. Conclusions: A high degree of consistency was demonstrated among the three protocols. It is suggested that in the use of the presently determined dose conversion factors across the three protocols, dose intercomparisons can be facilitated between radiotherapy centres.

Monte Carlo evaluation of uncertainties in photon and electron TG‐51 absorbed dose calibration

“…Elbashir et al. have compared the results of electron beam dose calibration using three different protocols: IAEA TRS398, TG‐51 and DIN 6800‐2 15 . For cylindrical chambers these authors report an uncertainty ( k = 1) of 1.4%.…”

“…Elbashir et al have compared the results of electron beam dose calibration using three different protocols: IAEA TRS398, TG-51 and DIN 6800-2. 15 For cylindrical chambers these authors report an uncertainty (k = 1) of 1.4%. Castro et al report the k = 1 uncertainty for electrons calibrated with a plane parallel Markus chamber using the IAEA TRS-398 protocol as1.7%.…”

“…The values of (P ion ) i are calculated using Equation (15) with the constraint that (P ion ) i > 1.000. It is assumed that V H /V L = 2 (exactly).…”