2013
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Double-Flap Incision to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Abstract: This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
27
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ogata et al used PRI with a scalpel during bone augmentation procedure, and reported that the average postoperative pain score in the first postoperative week was 37.5 mm. 5 In the same period, the mean pain score perceived by the patients in this study was 6.42 mm. Moreover, the results of this study demonstrated minimal need for NSAIDs in the postoperative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ogata et al used PRI with a scalpel during bone augmentation procedure, and reported that the average postoperative pain score in the first postoperative week was 37.5 mm. 5 In the same period, the mean pain score perceived by the patients in this study was 6.42 mm. Moreover, the results of this study demonstrated minimal need for NSAIDs in the postoperative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…1,2 Tension-free primary closure of soft tissue flap is a prerequisite for successful GBR. [3][4][5] On the other hand, failure to maintain primary closure usually results in flap dehiscence and membrane exposure and may lead to reduced quantity and quality of the regenerated bone. 6 Periosteal releasing incision (PRI) is the most common method to ensure tension-free primary closure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Periosteal fenestration and vertical-releasing incisions are commonly used for vertical GBR to elevate a tensionless flap [11,18,29,30]. Nevertheless, this flap design often results in complications such as swelling, bleeding, and patient discomfort, as well as flap perforation and graft exfoliation in 2.5-10% of the cases, depending on the augmentation technique [19]. One of the main causes behind these complications is probably the placement of deep periosteal incisions, which interrupts periosteal blood vessel circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from decreasing flap tension, the placement of incisions, which disrupt the continuity of the periosteal layer, may negatively affect periosteal blood supply. As an alternative to the classical full-thickness flap design for vertical GBR, a splitthickness flap approach was suggested by several authors, which might similarly result in a tension-free wound closure but at the same time avoiding the previously mentioned adverse events related to full-thickness flaps [19,20]. More recently, in order to additionally improve the healing and to improve the predictability of vertical augmentation procedures, our group proposed a novel minimally invasive split-thickness flap design without vertical-releasing incisions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%