2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.02.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dry etching of PMMA and polycarbonate in diffusion pump-based O2 capacitively coupled plasma and inductively coupled plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For PMMA, on the other hand, the ability of the polymer to unzip its backbone repeat elements after creation of a radical amplifies the impact of the formation of backbone radicals by plasma hydroxyl radicals. Thus, in contrast to Park et al,41 we interpret the observed faster etch rate of PMMA compared with polycarbonate as a consequence of the ability of the former polymer to undergo depolymerisation by backbone unzipping, whereas polycarbonate must be etched a radical at a time, with no amplification by unzipping possible. The unzipping by radical propagation leads to a significantly faster etch rate for PMMA as the resultant monomer units volatilise readily.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For PMMA, on the other hand, the ability of the polymer to unzip its backbone repeat elements after creation of a radical amplifies the impact of the formation of backbone radicals by plasma hydroxyl radicals. Thus, in contrast to Park et al,41 we interpret the observed faster etch rate of PMMA compared with polycarbonate as a consequence of the ability of the former polymer to undergo depolymerisation by backbone unzipping, whereas polycarbonate must be etched a radical at a time, with no amplification by unzipping possible. The unzipping by radical propagation leads to a significantly faster etch rate for PMMA as the resultant monomer units volatilise readily.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Etching of PMMA and polycarbonate has been discussed by Hamidi38 and polymer etching due to attack from plasmas of gases such as argon, helium, hydrogen and nitrogen has been reported by Hegemann et al,31 Nelea et al,39 Fozza et al40 and Zajickova et al16 Of particular relevance is the work done by Park et al41 as they directly compared the dry etch behaviour of PMMA and polycarbonate in an RF‐driven oxygen plasma and reported a faster etch rate for PMMA than for polycarbonate. Their explanation links the etch rate with the melting points of the two polymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, short plasma nanotexturing modifies the chemistry and the topography of the polymeric surface without affecting the bulk properties, creates nanoscale surface roughness (nanotexture) and is used for controlling the optical, wetting, and flow properties, as well as biomolecule adsorption and cell adhesion on such surfaces . This surface treatment is used in polymer‐based microdevices, for flow control of micro‐/nanofilters, flexible electronics, and bio‐MEMS . The O 2 plasma modification of a PMMA surface results in high aspect ratio (HAR) topography with pillar‐like structures .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers are extensively applied in many areas of medicine due to its bioinert characteristic and its ease of tailoring their physical and chemical properties for a given purpose. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is also widely used in many areas of life due to its superior chemical and physical properties. It has excellent light transmittance, low density, and mechanical properties (impact strength, toughness) superior to glass .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%