Comparison of Dynamic, Static, and Combination Training on Dominant Wrist Flexor Muscles

Belka, David E.

doi:10.1080/10671188.1968.10618044

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This result is consistent with the results of Belka (1968) who found the extended wrist posture to be stronger than the neutral in wrist flexion. Although this appears to violate the sliding filament model (Huxley, 1974) which implies that a muscle fiber produces its maximum tension when it is at its resting length, these results can be explained with the lengthtension relationship of muscles.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 95%

“…With the elbow flexed at W", static and A number of researchers have studied wrist Belka (1968) carried out an experiment to study dynamic wrist flexion strengths were measured before and after training in three positions: 0", 20" flexion, and 45" extension. The analysis focused on comparing the different training methods, and there was no attempt to discuss the effect of wrist position on wrist flexion strength.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Limitations of Wrist Strength to Manual Exertion Capability in 2D Biomechanical Modeling

Al-Eisawi

Kerk

Congleton

1994

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study is to evaluate the assumption in biomechanical models that wrist strength does not limit manual exertion capability. An experiment was designed and run on righthanded males to test isometric elbow flexion strength at two included elbow angles: 90" and 135" and in two forearm positions: supinated and mid between supination and pronation. Isometric wrist flexion strength was also measured at the same elbow angles and at two wrist positions in the flexion/extension plane: neutral and 45" extended. Isometric wrist radial deviation strength was measured at the same two elbow angles and at two wrist positions in the radial/uinar deviation plane: neutral and 30" ulnarly deviated. An equation was developed to calculate the theoretical minimum wrist strength limits for which wrist strength does not limit maximal moments about the elbow. These calculated limits were compared to the corresponding measured wrist strength moments. In general, wrist strength was found to be non-limiting, but in some specific circumstances, it can be limiting. Among the posture/exertion combinations tested, only wrist flexion strength in the extended wrist posture was found to be limiting. There was some evidence that strong-wrist people show less wrist strength limitations than weak-wrist people in some postures. It was also found that the neutral wrist posture is not associated with the highest wrist strength.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 95%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Limitations of Wrist Strength to Manual Exertion Capability in 2D Biomechanical Modeling

Al-Eisawi

Kerk

Congleton

1994

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This result implies that exercise at concentric contraction and isometric contraction (Fmax) is equally effective for increasing Fmax, supporting in part the study by Fukunaga and Sugiyama (2). A combined training of Fmax with weight training has been reported to be significantly effective in increasing 1RM (1,8) or Fmax (16). McKethan and Mayhew (11) reported that the effect on Fmax by combined training with Fmax and 1RM was comparable with single-load training by either 1RM or Fmax.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Effect of Multiple-Load Training on the Force-Velocity Relationship

Toji

Kaneko

2004

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toji, H., and M. Kaneko. Effect of multiple-load training on the force-velocity relationship. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18(4):792-795. 2004.-The effect of training with a combination of different loads (multiple-load training) on the force-velocity and force-power relationships was examined with training programs that included maximal isometric contraction (Fmax) and concentric contraction of the elbow flexor muscles. Twenty-one male college students were placed into 3 equal training groups (G 30 ϩ 60 , G 30 ϩ 100 , and G 30 ϩ 60 ϩ 100 ) and performed multiple-load training 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The training load was a set fraction of the maximal isometric strength (% Fmax). The G 30 ϩ 60 group performed 6 repetitions of elbow flexion at 30 and 60% Fmax. The G 30 ϩ 100 group performed 6 repetitions at 30% Fmax and six 5-second Fmax loads. The G 30 ϩ 60 ϩ 100 group performed 4 repetitions at 30 and 60% Fmax and four 5-second Fmax loads. After training, Fmax and maximal velocity significantly increased (p Ͻ 0.05) in all 3 training groups. The increases in maximal power were significantly (p Ͻ 0.05) different between the G 30 ϩ 60 ϩ 100 group (52.9%) and the G 30 ϩ 100 group (24.2%). These results suggest that multiple-load training programs with 4-6 repetitions are effective for improving muscle power and velocity of the elbow flexors.

show abstract

“…(36,59,99,124,130,174-179,198,199,211,311,356,379,(9-11,50,107,113,123,163,165,167,201,216,252,285,310,325,348,375,388,389) (3,4,(15)(16)(17)19,23,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) (35,39,40,45,48,(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58))(66,67,70,72,75,78,96,97,100,111,119,133,137,138,146,156,162,166,170,186,191,192,196,205)(219,…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(1)(2)(3)(4)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)23,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)39,40) (42)(43)(44)(45)47,48,50,(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)…”

unclassified

History of Strength Training Research in Man: An Inventory and Quantitative Overview of Studies Published in English Between 1894 and 1979

Nuzzo¹

2021

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nuzzo, JL. History of strength training research in man: an inventory and quantitative overview of studies published in English between 1894 and 1979. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1425–1448, 2021—Limited scholarship exists on the history of strength training research. The current review advances existing qualitative and biographical work by inventorying all experimental studies and case reports published before 1980 on the effects of ≥1 week of strength training on human health and function. Data on authors, journals, citations, study samples, training interventions, study outcomes, and study themes were extracted and summarized. Three hundred thirty-nine strength training studies were published between 1894 and 1979. Studies included 14,575 subjects, with 10,350 undergoing strength training. Subjects were usually healthy (81.1% of articles), university students (51.0%), or aged 18–65 years (86.7%). Men comprised 70.0% of subjects. Interventions typically involved isoinertial only (64.6%) or isometric only (35.4%) training. Upper-body interventions were more common (35.4%) than lower-body interventions (27.4%). Duration and frequency of training were typically 4–8 weeks (55.3%) and 3 days per week (39.2%), respectively. Isometric maximal voluntary contractions (54.0%) and one repetition maximum (20.4%) were the most common muscle strength tests. Other common outcomes included limb girths (20.9%) and muscle endurance (19.5%). Common research themes were physiology (54.3%), physical fitness (28.9%), and injury/rehabilitation (20.4%). The 339 studies have been cited 21,996 times. Moritani and deVries' 1979 article on time course of neuromuscular adaptations is the most highly cited (1,815 citations). DeLorme (5 articles and 772 citations), Hellebrandt (4 articles and 402 citations), Rasch (9 articles and 318 citations), and Berger (12 articles and 1,293 citations) made the largest contributions. Research Quarterly published the most articles (27.4%). The history of strength training research is discussed in the context of the results.

show abstract

Comparison of Dynamic, Static, and Combination Training on Dominant Wrist Flexor Muscles

Cited by 8 publications

References 4 publications

Limitations of Wrist Strength to Manual Exertion Capability in 2D Biomechanical Modeling

Limitations of Wrist Strength to Manual Exertion Capability in 2D Biomechanical Modeling

Effect of Multiple-Load Training on the Force-Velocity Relationship

History of Strength Training Research in Man: An Inventory and Quantitative Overview of Studies Published in English Between 1894 and 1979

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About