2022
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China

Abstract: The article reports results that compare the self‐perceptions of Chinese early career researchers (ECRs) with those of senior career researchers (SCRs) as peer reviewers, aiming to show the characteristics of the increasing number of Chinese ECRs as reviewers. An investigation was conducted with 207 Chinese researchers (including 116 ECRs and 91 SCRs) using an online questionnaire from October to November 2021. The results show the differences and similarities between ECRs and SCRs in five dimensions: views, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivation for peer review is to give something back to the scientific community, but the benefit is greater when the journal is high impact: they report having received formal review training in the form of journal guidelines or informally through colleagues, while 77% acknowledge their interest in receiving more training in peer review. In addition, Wang et al (2022) compared the self-perceptions of Chinese researchers distinguishing between early (ECRs) and senior (SCRs) career researchers. ECR consider peer review as an extra-role responsibility and are more willing to accept review invitations from high-quality indexed journals than SCR, but both have similar conscientiousness and agreeableness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for peer review is to give something back to the scientific community, but the benefit is greater when the journal is high impact: they report having received formal review training in the form of journal guidelines or informally through colleagues, while 77% acknowledge their interest in receiving more training in peer review. In addition, Wang et al (2022) compared the self-perceptions of Chinese researchers distinguishing between early (ECRs) and senior (SCRs) career researchers. ECR consider peer review as an extra-role responsibility and are more willing to accept review invitations from high-quality indexed journals than SCR, but both have similar conscientiousness and agreeableness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex is formed by three building blocks that link to form an E-shaped layout. In terms of building orientation, it has two facets: to the west, the continuous frontage and greenery from adjacent buildings are aligned with this building and offer a degree of protection from noise pollution (Wang, 2013). However, the east side which faces towards residential zones, is where the three wings ends and become integrated with gardens.…”
Section: Building Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%