1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1981.tb05848.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of early developmental stages and adults of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, and hybrid carp (female grass carp × male bighead Aristichthys nobilis)

Abstract: Hybrid carp and grass carp from the zygote to the prolarval stage and adults were compared to establish distinguishing characteristics. Zygote diameter, yolk sac and embryo length were not different between the fishes. Body pigmentation patterns showed distinct separation among the prolarvae of the hybrids and grass carp. Total and preanal myomeres were higher in grass carp larvae than in the hybrids. The grass carp and hybrid larvae also differed in 38% ofthe proportional morphometric characters.Average meris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research with this hybrid carp estimated that it would require more than double density of hybrids to obtain the same level of vegetation control as grass carp [827]. Morphological and developmental comparisons between this hybrid and grass carp have been published [73,828]. Research has documented that underyearling hybrid grass carp × bighead carp preferred coontail, Chara sp.…”
Section: Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research with this hybrid carp estimated that it would require more than double density of hybrids to obtain the same level of vegetation control as grass carp [827]. Morphological and developmental comparisons between this hybrid and grass carp have been published [73,828]. Research has documented that underyearling hybrid grass carp × bighead carp preferred coontail, Chara sp.…”
Section: Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae of the remaining 9 native species have been described: California roach (Lavinia symmetricus) by Fry (1936) and Wang (1986); hitch (Lavinia exilicauda), hardhead (Mylopharodon conocephalus), Sacramento blackfish (Orthodon microlepidotus), Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus), Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus grandis), and Lahotan redside (Richardsonius egregius) by Wang (1986); and tui chub (Siphateles bicolor) by Remple and Markle (2005). Nonnative larvae have been described: goldfish (Carassius auratus), red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis), and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) by Snyder et al (2005), Wang (1986), and other authors; grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) by Kilambi and Zdinak (1981), Lin (1935), and Soin and Sukhanova (1972); golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) by Heufelder and Fuiman (1982), Snyder et al (1977), Wang (1986), others; fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) by Heufelder and Fuiman (1982), Remple and Markle (2005), Snyder (1981), Snyder et al (1977Snyder et al ( , 2005, and Wang (1986); tench (Tinca tinca) by Alikunhi and Runganathan (1947), Kennedy and Fitzmaurice (1970), and others. Remple and Markle (2005) described northern fathead minnow populations (Pimephales promelas promelas) with different characteristics from the southern fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas confertus) found in southern California (Miller 1952;Swift et al 1993;Simon and Markle 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%