Comparison of Ecological Momentary Assessment Versus Direct Measurement of E-Cigarette Use With a Bluetooth-Enabled E-Cigarette: A Pilot Study

Abstract

BackgroundAssessing the frequency and intensity of e-cigarette use presents special challenges beyond those posed by cigarette use. Accurate measurement of e-cigarette consumption, puff duration, and the stability of these measures over time will be informative for estimating the behavioral and health effects of e-cigarette use.ObjectiveThe purpose of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of self-reported e-cigarette puff counts collected via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to objective puff count data collected by a Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette device and to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using a second-generation e-cigarette among adult smokers.MethodsA total of 5 adult smokers were enrolled in a longitudinal parent study assessing how e-cigarette use affects cigarette use among e-cigarette–naïve smokers. Using a text message–based EMA system, participants reported e-cigarette puffs for 2 weeks. Participants were also given a Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette (Smokio) that passively collected puff counts and puff duration. Comparisons between mean reports of Smokio (device-report) and EMA (self-report) use were evaluated using paired t tests. Correlation and agreement between device- and self-reports were evaluated using Pearson correlation and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), respectively. A linear mixed effect model was used to determine the fixed effect of timing and Smokio-reported daily puffs on report accuracy. We examined the relationship between time of day and reporting accuracy using Tukey's test for multiple pairwise comparisons.ResultsA total of 5 African American participants, 4 men and 1 woman, who ranged in age from 24 to 59 years completed the study, resulting in 5180 observations (device-report) of e-cigarette use. At baseline, participants reported smoking for 5 to 25 years and consumed a mean of 7 to 13 cigarettes per day (CPD); 4 smoked within 30 minutes of waking. At the 30-day follow-up, CPD range decreased to 1 to 3 cigarettes; 4 participants reported past 7-day e-cigarette use, and 1 participant reported no cigarette smoking in the past 7 days. Over 2 weeks of e-cigarette use, participants took an average of 1074 e-cigarette (SD 779.0) puffs per person as captured by the device reports. Each participant took a mean of 75.0 (SD 58.8) puffs per day, with each puff lasting an average of 3.6 (SD 2.4) seconds. Device reports captured an average of 33.3 (SD 47.8) more puffs per person per day than the self-reported e-cigarette puffs. In 87% of days, participants underestimated the number of puffs they had taken on the Smokio. There was significant moderate correlation (r=.47, P<.001) but poor agreement (pc=0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.46) between the device- and self-reported data. Reporting accuracy was affected by amount and timing of e-cigarette use.ConclusionsCompared to self-reported e-cigarette use, the Bluetooth-enabled device captured significantly more e-cigarette use and allowed for examination of puff duration in addition to puff counts. A Bluetooth-enab...

Technology‐based contingency management and e‐cigarettes during the initial weeks of a smoking quit attempt

“…Despite the negative ratings by a few participants, most endorsed positive aspects of the EC such as its ability to reduce cravings, its convenience, and its overall helpfulness in quitting smoking. Sample responses to what they liked most about the EC indicated, “It was easy to use,” “It was a pain‐free way to quit smoking,” “I quit,” and “Calm urges.” These results parallel a descriptive study of a Bluetooth‐enabled EC (the Smokio) in five adults (Pearson et al, ). Participants reported that the device was convenient and acceptable, and they liked “the ability to use the Smokio in places where they could not smoke a cigarette” (p. 6).…”

“…We also assessed the social validity of the intervention components via questionnaire at study completion. We measured vaping using a Bluetoothenabled EC that recorded each puff via ignition button clicks (Dautzenberg & Bricard, 2015;Pearson et al, 2017) and used an internetbased method to obtain measures of CO twice per day and deliver CM (Dallery, Raiff, & Grabinski, 2013). Breath CO is not affected by vaping (Vansickel, Cobb, Weaver, & Eissenberg, 2010).…”

Potential predictors of adoption of the Tobacco Heating System by U.S. adult smokers: An actual use study

“…Finally, no biochemical verification of tobacco consumption, such as CO monitoring, was used, as the method of data collection relied exclusively on self-reported tobacco consumption. With regard to this point, it should be noted that validation studies have shown that self-reported tobacco consumption behaviors among adults are consistent and reliable 50, 65 .…”

Feasibility of a Mobile Phone App to Support Recovery From Addiction in China: Secondary Analysis of a Pilot Study

“…These results are similar to those of previous studies. For example, Pearson [ 34 ] compared the accuracy of self-reported electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) puff counts using the EMA to objective puff count data collected by a Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette device and found poor agreement between the device data and the self-reported data. Solhan [ 35 ] examined the discrepancies among trait questionnaires, retrospective reports, and EMA measures of affective instability in psychiatric outpatients and found poor agreement between recalled mood changes and the EMA.…”