2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of efficacy for postoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy in patients with IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer: An early closed randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
78
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
78
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…PORT had survival advantages in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy, in which the use of PORT was not randomized or mandatory [4], and in two population-based cohort studies, one using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) [5] and the other using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [6]. On the other hand, in the randomized controlled trial conducted by Shen et al[10], PORT decreased the incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis, but failed to improve overall survival (OS) when administered after complete resection of N2 NSCLCs. PORT also failed to improve OS, as well as failure-free survival, in the earlier study by Perry et al [11] on resected N2 NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PORT had survival advantages in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy, in which the use of PORT was not randomized or mandatory [4], and in two population-based cohort studies, one using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) [5] and the other using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [6]. On the other hand, in the randomized controlled trial conducted by Shen et al[10], PORT decreased the incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis, but failed to improve overall survival (OS) when administered after complete resection of N2 NSCLCs. PORT also failed to improve OS, as well as failure-free survival, in the earlier study by Perry et al [11] on resected N2 NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite improvements in radiotherapy delivery [1,2] and novel chemotherapy combinations and schemes [3,4], the median survival in this relatively heterogeneous collective population is $21 months with 3 year survival rates of $30% [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite slow accrual and a limited sample size of 140 patients, this study demonstrated improved local and regional control and improved distant disease free survival with POCRT. POCRT was also associated with a higher median survival (40 vs. 28 months) and although not statistically significant, the hazard ratio for death in the POCRT of 0.69 trended favorably (P=0.073) (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A recent randomized phase III study of patients with pN2 NSCLC evaluated treatment with either adjuvant chemotherapy alone versus concurrent chemotherapy followed by PORT (POCRT) (12). Despite slow accrual and a limited sample size of 140 patients, this study demonstrated improved local and regional control and improved distant disease free survival with POCRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%