2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Eight Echocardiographic Methods for Determining the Prevalence of Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Site of Latest Mechanical Contraction in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significantly better prognosis was found in patients with a substantial time delay between the antero-septal and posterior segments (≥130 ms). In spite of the methodological limits of the study, i.e., only radial strain to assess left ventricular dyssynchrony [49] and simple retrospective radiographical assessment of lead position, this study is the first which demonstrates how lead position, electro-mechanical delay, and presence of scar are inextricably linked and impact on the prognosis of CRT patients. Leyva et al [47] also showed that LV lead position inside the scar region results in a fivefold risk of pump failure and sudden cardiac death as compared to patients with no scar and patients with scar, but LV lead positioned elsewhere combined.…”
Section: Left Bundle Branch Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significantly better prognosis was found in patients with a substantial time delay between the antero-septal and posterior segments (≥130 ms). In spite of the methodological limits of the study, i.e., only radial strain to assess left ventricular dyssynchrony [49] and simple retrospective radiographical assessment of lead position, this study is the first which demonstrates how lead position, electro-mechanical delay, and presence of scar are inextricably linked and impact on the prognosis of CRT patients. Leyva et al [47] also showed that LV lead position inside the scar region results in a fivefold risk of pump failure and sudden cardiac death as compared to patients with no scar and patients with scar, but LV lead positioned elsewhere combined.…”
Section: Left Bundle Branch Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our study, we found no significant difference shortly after epirubicin administration evaluated by T LS-SD , T CS-SD and T RS-SD in adult patients. Speckle tracking echocardiography and real-time 3D echocardiography provide distinctly different measures of ventricular timing and cannot be considered directly comparable for assessing intraventricular dyssynchrony [21]. Furthermore, the cardiac damage induced by anthracycline progresses with time and young children are more susceptible to the injury.…”
Section: Beforementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 193 possible combinations of methods and walls, there was no agreement among methods in detecting the site of latest contraction in 77%, agreement between 2 of the 3 methods in 21%, and agreement between all 3 methods in only 4 instances (2%). Given the almost 100% sensitivity of 3DE and ST, the investigators question their additional value beyond a prolonged QRS (14). Despite the controversy over the value of echo Doppler measures of DYS and their ability to predict response to CRT, the value of these methods in assessing morphologic and functional changes following CRT remains unquestioned.…”
Section: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To further complicate this issue, Faletra et al (14) compared the prevalence of DYS and the site of latest LV activation reported by 8 different echocardiographic methods (TDI: n ϭ 4, ST: n ϭ 3, and 3DE) in 63 HF patients scheduled for CRT. Feasibility was generally good ranging for 100% for longitudinal ST to 71% for radial ST.…”
Section: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapymentioning
confidence: 98%