2021
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2020.3048095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Electric Machine Types for Electrically Driven Engine Accessories Using Multiphysics Simulation Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A thorough examination and comparison were conducted on these options, with a specific focus on current angle control throughout the complete torque-speed envelope. For a hybrid truck application, three distinct motors, including an SRM and an IPMSM, were designed and optimized in [10]. A comparative evaluation utilizing the Pugh matrix takes into account factors such as cost, efficiency, power density, fault tolerance, and manufacturability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough examination and comparison were conducted on these options, with a specific focus on current angle control throughout the complete torque-speed envelope. For a hybrid truck application, three distinct motors, including an SRM and an IPMSM, were designed and optimized in [10]. A comparative evaluation utilizing the Pugh matrix takes into account factors such as cost, efficiency, power density, fault tolerance, and manufacturability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different electrical machines, including DC, synchronous, and induction machines could be used for propulsion [2], [3]. Conventionally, the first-choice traction machine is the permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) due to its high torque density, and wide constant torque/ speed range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%