2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of electromyographic signals from monopolar current and potential amplifiers derived from a penniform muscle, the gastrocnemius medialis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous current-based concept [18,19] was implemented and extended. Originally intended for the measurement of muscle activity in electromyograms, we showed that the concept works equally well for the measurement of the electrocardiogram in underwater conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous current-based concept [18,19] was implemented and extended. Originally intended for the measurement of muscle activity in electromyograms, we showed that the concept works equally well for the measurement of the electrocardiogram in underwater conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signals were derived from electrical current using the monopolar current amplifier (also called a trans-impedance amplifier) with a feedback resistor of 2200 kX and a built-in band pass filter (10-500 Hz) as described previously (von Tscharner et al, 2013). The second stage amplification was set to 1, thereby resulting in a measured voltage of the EMG-signal of 2200 kX times the current entering the electrode.…”
Section: Electrode Placements and Emg Signal Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite limitations with respect to penniform muscles (Dimitrova et al, 1999;Mesin et al, 2011;von Tscharner et al, 2013), bipolar electrodes are used extensively due to their apparent advantage of reducing noise by sampling the potential difference across the electrodes (Cram et al, 1998). Another major limitation of bipolar electrodes is the fact that skin resistance is not large enough to prevent some lateral current flow across the skin between the electrodes (von Tscharner et al, 2013). The presence of sweat and water on or around the skin and electrodes, therefore, will only exacerbate this 'short-circuit' effect, making the detection of muscle activity difficult or impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations