2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of empirical and predicted substrate temperature during surface melting of microalloyed steel using TIG technique and considering three shielding gases

Abstract: Comparison of empirical and predicted substrate temperature during surface melting of microalloyed steel using TIG technique and considering three shielding gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary mathematical model [32] based on the Rosenthal approach [36] used often for modelling welding situations, was developed to predict the temperature at any point in space/time. Based on the increase in temperature (preheat) between the region close to the start of the track resulting from TIG processing and that close to the end of the track in the case of single track melting, Figure 2, shows a satisfactory agreement between experimental and numerical values obtained from the model [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A preliminary mathematical model [32] based on the Rosenthal approach [36] used often for modelling welding situations, was developed to predict the temperature at any point in space/time. Based on the increase in temperature (preheat) between the region close to the start of the track resulting from TIG processing and that close to the end of the track in the case of single track melting, Figure 2, shows a satisfactory agreement between experimental and numerical values obtained from the model [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrode was direct current negative and the tip of the order 1mm above the specimen surface to guarantee a constant energy input (E). Energy inputs in the range 210 to 1344 Jmm -1 were used over the course of the work [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations