Comparison of Empirical Peak Capacities for High-Efficiency Capillary Chromatographic Techniques

Abstract

Experimental peak capacities for capillary gas chromatography (GC), capillary liquid chromatography (CLC), and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) were compared. To obtain a meaningful comparison, the following constraints were applied. First, the same sample (mixture of alkylbenzenes) was used as a test mixture for all three techniques; second, the same packing material and column diameter were used in CLC and CEC; and third, isothermal conditions were used in GC, while isocratic conditions were used both in CLC and in CEC. Comparison of peak capacities for the same total column efficiency (approximately 36000 plates) showed that the peak capacity of GC is greater than those of the liquid-phase separation techniques. Comparison of CEC and CLC for constant retention factor was also carried out. For this condition, the results depend on the particle size used; for 3-microm porous particles, CEC had a peak capacity larger than CLC due to higher efficiency from the flow profile generated by electroosmotic flow. However, when 1.5-microm nonporous particles were used, the peak capacities were approximately the same for both techniques. The effect of linear velocity on peak capacity was also studied for all three techniques. Practical conditions aimed at increasing peak capacities of liquid-phase separation techniques are discussed.

Study of the Volatile Metabolome in Plant–Insect Interactions

“…In capillary GC using standard wall-coated open-tubular columns, peak capacities typically range between 120 and 250 for a standard GC temperature gradient program of 5-60 min runtime [30]. Full-scan MS detection adds extra and complementary selectivity to the chromatographic separation and furthermore leads to standardized mass spectra, independent of the type of GC-MS instrument manufacturer.…”

Chemometric approach for development, optimization, and validation of different chromatographic methods for separation of opium alkaloids

“…For a defined resolution of 2, within a time interval between the first and the last peak and an average peak width at halfheight [31], it was found that the GC method had a higher peak capacity (38.7) than the HPLC method (17.0).…”

Current Technologies and Considerations for Drug Bioanalysis in Oral Fluid

“…An approach to improve laboratory through� put and analyze a large number of analytes in a single run is to use ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems, which employ particle diameters as small as 1.5 µm and oper� ating pressures higher than 5000 psi. �owever, despite having several applications in the field of toxicology [164,[176][177][178][179], this technology has scarce application in oral fluid ana lysis [180].…”