Comparison of English narrow focus production by L1 English, Beijing and Taiwan Mandarin speakers

Abstract

L1 English and two varieties of L1 Mandarin English speech data were extracted from the Taiwan AESOP corpus (Asian English Speech cOrpus Project) for the purpose of investigating differences in the realization of English narrow focus by L1 speakers of North American English, Taiwan Mandarin and Beijing Mandarin. Results show the combined effect of two patterns of L2 focus production: general underdifferentiation of on-focus and post-focus contrasts, which was exhibited by both L2 speaker groups, and transfer of L1-specific prosodic features, which can be argued to represent the source of difference between the two L2 groups. Overall, on-focus/post-focus contrasts in mean F0, amplitude and pitch range were realized most robustly by L1 English speakers. L1 Taiwan Mandarin speakers produced a smaller increase in mean F0 and amplitude for on-focus constituents and much smaller decrease in mean F0 and amplitude on post-focus constituents than L1 English speakers did, whereas Beijing Mandarin speakers produced no increase in mean F0 in on-focus constituents, and the smallest decrease in mean F0 on post-focus constituents, but a 35% higher post-focus compression of intensity than Taiwan Mandarin speakers did. Notably, both L2 speaker groups failed to produce post-focus compression of pitch range, which has been shown to be a highly salient cue to the presence of focus in English.

Underdifferentiation of English lexical stress contrasts by L2 taiwan speakers

“…Other specific features found in both Taiwan and Beijing L2 English include underdifferentiation of narrow-focus and onfocus/no focus contrasts [5,6]. Similar underdifferentiation patterns were obtained in PVI analyses of Vietnamese Australian L2 English speech rhythm [7].…”

Taiwanese and Beijing Mandarin listeners’ perception of English focus prosody

“…In a production study of TM-speaking and BM-speaking learners of English, Visceglia et al [2] found mixed patterns of L1 transfer. In their English productions TM speakers showed reduced duration on post-focal materials, and both TM and BM speakers exhibited compression of post-focal intensity.…”

Emotional Prosody of Love and Sorrow: L1 English, TTS and EFL Learners

“…Compared to F0, the effect of intensity on prosody is not understood well. Visceglia et al (2012) reports that L1 English speakers raised the intensity on focus words more robustly compared to L2 English of Mandarin speakers, suggesting that their L1 use of acoustic correlates of focus may be transferred to L2 English. As for Japanese focus prosody, Lee and Xu (2012) found that the distribution of the intensity is similar to F0, in that the focus words should carry higher intensity and the pre-focus and post-focus words lower it.…”