2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of enhanced coalbed methane recovery by pure N2 and CO2 injection: Experimental observations and numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control equation of the gas flow field can be derived by the combination of Equations (13)(14) and (22)(23).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The control equation of the gas flow field can be derived by the combination of Equations (13)(14) and (22)(23).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well‐known that the methane generated in coal seams is an efficient and clean source of energy . In recent years, coalbed methane (CBM) development has received special attention in areas with multiple coal seams . Several unconventional gas resources located in coal deposits have been studied as systems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) geological storage through reducing the risk of CO 2 migration to the surface is becoming an important method for effective control of greenhouse gas [4][5][6][7]. CO 2 -enhanced coalbed methane (CO 2 -ECBM) recovery is a technology that increases CBM production while controlling greenhouse gas by injecting CO 2 into CBM reservoirs, which has already been applied in several field projects [8][9][10]. At the end of 20th century, a company named Amoco first carried out pilot field of ECBM recovery in the San Juan basin of the United States [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reeves and Oudinot (2004a;2004b) carried out a reservoir modeling study based on the Tiffany Unit N 2 -ECBM pilot; the economic result and future field performance were forecast. After the parallel ECBM displacement simulation experiments, Wang et al (2015) found that Coal seam permeability significantly affects the effect of CO 2 or N 2 flooding CH 4 and CO 2 as an injected gas is superior to N 2 . After reviewing the ECBM pilots projects in America and Europe, Oudinot et al (2007) found that coal permeability is reduced with CO 2 injection due to swelling, and is enhanced by N 2 injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%