2012
DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.12221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of estimated energy intake from 2×24-hour recalls and a seven-day food record with objective measurements of energy expenditure in children

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to evaluate energy intake (EI) estimated from two non-consecutive 24-hour recalls (24-HDRs) and a pre-coded seven-day food record (7-dFR) against objective measurements of energy expenditure (EE) in children.DesignA total of 67 7–8 year-olds and 64 12–13 year-olds completed the 2×24-HDRs, the 7-dFR, and wore ActiReg® (PreMed AS, Oslo, Norway), a combined position and motion recording instrument, during the same seven days as the 7-dFR was filled in.ResultsIn the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from other studies, in which accelerometers have been used to validate estimated EI from more traditional paper-based methods among children, are in line with our study: suggesting the proportion of under-reporters is a large problem [2931]. For example, estimated EI using a paper-based pre-coded food diary for four days in nine year old children suggested under-reporting of -1.8 MJ/day [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from other studies, in which accelerometers have been used to validate estimated EI from more traditional paper-based methods among children, are in line with our study: suggesting the proportion of under-reporters is a large problem [2931]. For example, estimated EI using a paper-based pre-coded food diary for four days in nine year old children suggested under-reporting of -1.8 MJ/day [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Severe under-reporting was also observed in a similar validation study of a paper-based pre-coded food diary among 13 year olds; the mean difference between EI and TEE showed under-reporting that varied from -1.3 to -4.8 MJ/day [29]. Rothausen et al report a difference between EI from a seven days food diary and TEE of -2.7 and -2.1 MJ/day for 12–13 year old boys and girls, respectively [31], which is comparable to our observations. However, these authors report better reporting accuracy for the same individuals using 2 x 24 hour recalls, and in seven to eight year old children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intakes of energy, nutrients and food items were calculated for each individual using the software system GIES (version 0.995a; developed at the National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark), and the Danish Food Composition Databank (version 7; ). Validation of the method for children and adults has been described elsewhere ( 15 , 16 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intakes of energy, nutrients and food items were calculated for each individual using the software system GIES version 0?995a (developed at the National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søborg, Denmark) and the Danish Food Composition Databank version 7 (www.foodcomp.dk). Validation of the method for children and adults is described elsewhere (14,15) . Besides energy intake and macronutrients, a number of food items were selected to give an indication of the diet quality.…”
Section: Assessment Of Dietary Intakementioning
confidence: 99%