2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ethanol/diesel fuel dual direct injection (DI2) strategy with reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) in a diesel research engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also depends on the injection scheduling and reactivity of the DI fuel. This is the primary advantage of the RCCI strategy, which facilitates modification of charge reactivity by varying the premixed ratio and DI timing as desired to reduce the PPRR at higher engine loads . Optimized injection scheduling allows smooth operation over the entire engine load in RCCI .…”
Section: Clean Combustion Via Engine Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also depends on the injection scheduling and reactivity of the DI fuel. This is the primary advantage of the RCCI strategy, which facilitates modification of charge reactivity by varying the premixed ratio and DI timing as desired to reduce the PPRR at higher engine loads . Optimized injection scheduling allows smooth operation over the entire engine load in RCCI .…”
Section: Clean Combustion Via Engine Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Managing in-cylinder charge reactivity by controlling fuel ow gives more dominance over combustion phase control in RCCI operations under variable loads. 20 The LRF also serves as diluents for the injected liquid fuel and the oxygen content inside the cylinder. The gaseous LRF also increases diffusivity and phase homogeneity resulting in much cleaner combustion and less emissions (NO x , PM, UHC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCCI strategy has been experimented with methanol–diesel dual-fuel operation and found an enhanced possibility of using methanol to diesel share up to 56% with significant NO and soot reduction (95% and 78%, respectively). 24 Working on higher UHC and CO emissions in the RCCI strategy, Fırat et al 20 have found that direct injection of ethanol as an LRF is beneficial over port injection with a comparable reduction in UHC and CO at the rates of 16% and 35% respectively. Other researchers 20,25 also experienced similar ethanol prospects to be used as LRF in RCCI mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these efforts have been focused on improving diesel fuel in the form of blended fuel to obtain durable and efficient superior blends to replace conventional diesel fuel. The primary diesel fuel blends developed thus far include ethanol [25][26][27][28][29] , biodiesel [30][31][32][33] , hydrogen 11,34,35 ; water-diesel 2,36,37 , vegetable oil [38][39][40] and various other oxygenated fuels [41][42][43][44] . It is widely thought that the reformulation of diesel fuels has played a significant role in attaining considerable reductions in exhaust emissions 39,[45][46][47] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%