2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of EUS-guided rendezvous and precut papillotomy techniques for biliary access (with videos)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an individually higher risk of complications from any procedure may be indicated by failed primary biliary cannulation in cases selected for EUS-BD. A retrospective study found a higher complication rate for endoscopic precut papillotomy than for the EUS-guided rendezvous procedure after failed primary biliary cannulation [133]. Complication rates in EUS-guided drainage procedures have been shown to decrease with growing experience of centers and single endoscopists [134, 135].…”
Section: Endoscopic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an individually higher risk of complications from any procedure may be indicated by failed primary biliary cannulation in cases selected for EUS-BD. A retrospective study found a higher complication rate for endoscopic precut papillotomy than for the EUS-guided rendezvous procedure after failed primary biliary cannulation [133]. Complication rates in EUS-guided drainage procedures have been shown to decrease with growing experience of centers and single endoscopists [134, 135].…”
Section: Endoscopic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS is being increasingly used as an alternative to percutaneous techniques for accessing the biliary tract for combined procedures [21]. The major advantage of EUS-guided biliary approach is that both guide wire passage and ERCP can be undertaken in the same session (Figure 8.4a-d).…”
Section: Eus-guided Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] These procedures are considered to have a lower risk of severe peritonitis compared with EUS-HGS and CDS. Therefore, a means of reducing complications and troubleshooting techniques for EUS-BD should be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%