2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of evaporative fractions estimated from AVHRR and MODIS sensors over South Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
59
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2017, 9, 26 3 of 25 the temperature of the air within the canopy [39,41]. This provides a meaningful insight in the interpretation of the − triangle method mentioned above.…”
Section: Study Area and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2017, 9, 26 3 of 25 the temperature of the air within the canopy [39,41]. This provides a meaningful insight in the interpretation of the − triangle method mentioned above.…”
Section: Study Area and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A number of studies have used EF to represent moisture conditions of ecosystems (Kurc and Small, 2004;Zhang et al, 2004;Suleiman and Crago, 2004). In addition, EF can be derived from remotely sensed vegetation indices and land surface temperature products from satellites such as AVHRR and MODIS (Venturini et al, 2004), a major advantage of this approach.…”
Section: Description Of the Ec-lue Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Terra sensor carried on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), capable of observing ground objects of 0.44 km 2 in areal extent, is relatively preferable for rapid landslide detection. To overcome cloud contamination in frequent remote sensing, the maximum value composite (MVC) method has been widely used for Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and MODIS products (Venturini et al 2004). The aim of the proposed approach is to detect landslides in cloudy mountains by means of an MVCbased analysis of MODIS images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%