2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2010.5470671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of exact static and dynamic Bayesian context inference methods for activity recognition

Abstract: This paper compares the performance of inference in static and dynamic Bayesian Networks. For the comparison both kinds of Bayesian networks are created for the exemplary application activity recognition. Probability and structure of the Bayesian Networks have been learnt automatically from a recorded data set consisting of acceleration data observed from an inertial measurement unit. Whereas dynamic networks incorporate temporal dependencies which affect the quality of the activity recognition, inference is l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayslets enable a complex bayesian network to be subdivided into smaller RV groups (see VII). For example, motion and presence activity may be treated as separate Bayesian Networks, implemented using different JBI "java beans" and mathematically combined using the rules described in [22]. This is an inherently more scalable approach than the one we have taken as context inference is more easily expressed as smaller networks that are "fused" based on well defined and rules.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussion Of Ongoing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayslets enable a complex bayesian network to be subdivided into smaller RV groups (see VII). For example, motion and presence activity may be treated as separate Bayesian Networks, implemented using different JBI "java beans" and mathematically combined using the rules described in [22]. This is an inherently more scalable approach than the one we have taken as context inference is more easily expressed as smaller networks that are "fused" based on well defined and rules.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussion Of Ongoing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В работах по распознаванию видов активности человека [14,15,18,20,37,39] датчики размещали на следующих частях тела человека: руки, запястье, грудь, пояс, лодыжки, а также в карманах, расположенных в районе бедра человека.…”
Section: размещение и ориентация датчиковunclassified
“…Also, it can provide great help for users to identify the type of a given context before using it. As context could be categorized from different perspective, the list in Table 1 summarizes a few well-known forms of context classification given in the current literature [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Principles Of Context Aware Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%