2013
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318287d0b9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Facial Trauma in Late Middle Age (55–64 Years) and Old Age (Older Than 65 Years)

Abstract: In this study, we attempted to compare facial trauma of late-middle-age patients (55-64 years, LM group) and old-age patients (>65 years old, OL group). The goal of this study was to evaluate the natural history of facial trauma in geriatric patients.The medical record of patients older than 55 years seeking treatment for facial trauma between March 2006 and February 2009 were reviewed, and parameters were collected. Seven hundred seventy-two patients (553 male, 219 female) were analyzed. There were 438 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although comparisons between these populations with regard to craniofacial trauma have been made, previous studies have lacked subject numbers large enough to perform fracture-specific and multivariable analysis. 3,6,[20][21][22][23][24] The study did not aim to provide fracture-specific treatment algorithms for geriatric patients, as this has previously been reported by our group, 9 and principles of treatment do not differ drastically between geriatric and nongeriatric adult populations. 25 Also, our study did not evaluate preexisting medical conditions, which may significantly increase the rates of death following trauma in geriatric patients, either during hospitalization or within 1 year of a fall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although comparisons between these populations with regard to craniofacial trauma have been made, previous studies have lacked subject numbers large enough to perform fracture-specific and multivariable analysis. 3,6,[20][21][22][23][24] The study did not aim to provide fracture-specific treatment algorithms for geriatric patients, as this has previously been reported by our group, 9 and principles of treatment do not differ drastically between geriatric and nongeriatric adult populations. 25 Also, our study did not evaluate preexisting medical conditions, which may significantly increase the rates of death following trauma in geriatric patients, either during hospitalization or within 1 year of a fall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a study by Con et al, [ 20 ] middle age individuals (age 45–65) represented more than half of all falls from ladders and suffered significantly greater injuries than the younger cohort. At the same time, there is considerable evidence that alcohol and drug use amongst older people is high and increasing [ 6 , 7 , 14 , [21] , [22] , [23] ] including binge drinking and mixing alcohol with prescription sedative-hypnotic drugs [ 13 ]. For the middle-aged, an increase in the number of falls observed may be more related to substance abuse than to frailty as seen in the elderly (>65 years) [ 6 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Medial wall fractures have been known to be less frequent than other types. 5,6 In contrast, orbital floor fracture is thought to be the most common blowout fracture type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%