2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2397-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal malignancy

Abstract: FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI showed similar high accuracy for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis. • In the supramesocolic area, MR-DWI could be more sensitive than PET/CT. • Both techniques showed lower sensitivity for subcentimetre lesions. • Interobserver agreement was very good for PET/CT and good for MR-DWI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
80
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity and specificity of ∼90% achieved here for untreated tumors as small as 30 μm represents a significant improvement over the 86% and 53% tumor sensitivity and specificity reported for always-on verteporfin (32). This level of selectivity also results in a two order-of-magnitude improvement in tumor-imaging resolution compared with current clinical imaging technologies (e.g., positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging), which have 40-50% sensitivity for subcentimeter tumors (10,11). These developments address the lack of imaging technologies for detecting and monitoring micrometastatic disease (3) and open the door to patient-tailored therapeutic regimens based upon real-time feedback regarding the presence and response of residual disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity and specificity of ∼90% achieved here for untreated tumors as small as 30 μm represents a significant improvement over the 86% and 53% tumor sensitivity and specificity reported for always-on verteporfin (32). This level of selectivity also results in a two order-of-magnitude improvement in tumor-imaging resolution compared with current clinical imaging technologies (e.g., positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging), which have 40-50% sensitivity for subcentimeter tumors (10,11). These developments address the lack of imaging technologies for detecting and monitoring micrometastatic disease (3) and open the door to patient-tailored therapeutic regimens based upon real-time feedback regarding the presence and response of residual disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…These residual micrometastases are clinically occult until gross recurrence, which is often refractory to standard treatments (1,2,4). Laparotomy, an invasive surgical reassessment, frequently fails to detect residual disease (9) while noninvasive clinical imaging modalities also have poor sensitivity for subcentimeter tumors (10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of integrated PET/CT has become well established within the last decade for whole-body staging in oncologic patients (6). Various studies investigating the diagnostic capacity of DWI or MR imaging and of PET/CT have reported comparable results for detection and characterization of tumors, including gynecologic malignancies (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI ve PET/BT'nin birlikte kullanılması ile tanısal doğruluğun ve özellikle de negatif prediktif değerin yükseldiği bildirilmektedir (12). Ancak 1 cm altındaki peritoneal lezyonların saptanmasında her iki tetkik de yetersizdir (13,14). Bizim çalışmamızda 8 hastaya uygulanan PET/BT'nin 4 ü şüpheli olarak yorumlanmış ancak PC varlığını dışlayacak kadar güçlü bulgulara rastlanmamıştır.…”
Section: Yöntemunclassified