2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07307-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of FEA simulations and experimental results for as-built additively manufactured dogbone specimens

Abstract: Parts built using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM -an additive manufacturing technology) differ from their design model in terms of their microstructure and material properties. These differences lead to a certain amount of ambiguity regarding the structure, strength and stiffness of the nal FDM part.Increasing use of FDM parts as end use products, necessitates accurate simulations and analyses during part design. However, analysis methods such as Finite Element Analysis, are used for analysis of continuum mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have postulated three key reasons for this discrepancy: the material model definition, surface roughness and geometrical deviation, and the possible internal defects. The considered material model, indeed, neglects the anisotropy caused by the manufacturing process that can lead to anisotropic material response in the specimen [44].…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have postulated three key reasons for this discrepancy: the material model definition, surface roughness and geometrical deviation, and the possible internal defects. The considered material model, indeed, neglects the anisotropy caused by the manufacturing process that can lead to anisotropic material response in the specimen [44].…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the contact force is affected by the vertical extrusion velocity, horizontal moving speed, the diameter of the nozzle, the melting temperature, the distance between the material surface and the extruder (Comminal et al , 2018; Xia et al , 2018). Conventionally, finite element analysis is used to predict the 3D printed part’s deformation and residual stress under such a complex physical environment (Baikerikar and Turner, 2021; Brenken et al , 2019; Samy et al , 2021). Software such as Abaqus TM , Ansys TM and COMSOL TM can be used to simulate the FDM processes of very simple geometries (thin walls and squares) when using powerful parallel computing resources.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%