2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18020679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Feature Learning Methods for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors

Abstract: Getting a good feature representation of data is paramount for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors. An increasing number of feature learning approaches—in particular deep-learning based—have been proposed to extract an effective feature representation by analyzing large amounts of data. However, getting an objective interpretation of their performances faces two problems: the lack of a baseline evaluation setup, which makes a strict comparison between them impossible, and the insufficiency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
219
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
219
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the above segment approach, each "picture" consists of a T×S matrix. We set the segment parameters like [44], use a time-window of 2s on the OPPORTUNITY and PAMAP2 datasets, resulting in T=64, and σ = 3. On the UniMiB-SHAR dataset, a time-window of 2s was used, resulting in T=96.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the above segment approach, each "picture" consists of a T×S matrix. We set the segment parameters like [44], use a time-window of 2s on the OPPORTUNITY and PAMAP2 datasets, resulting in T=64, and σ = 3. On the UniMiB-SHAR dataset, a time-window of 2s was used, resulting in T=96.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early fusion. All joints from multi-sensors in different parts are stacked as input of the network [22,44].…”
Section: Scalability To Multiple Sensors (Imus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning-based methods include AE [24], MLP [25], CNN [14], LSTM [26], Hybrid [27], ResNet [20]. As in conventional methods, we use hand-crafted features, readers can find more details in [37]. For learning-based methods, we use raw activity data as input.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For learning-based methods, we use raw activity data as input. Follow by [37], the hyper-parameters of these learning-based baseline models except ResNet 2 for the OPPORTUNITY and UniMiB-SHAR datasets are provided in Table 6. iii. Implementation and Setting…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of these methods is that they rely heavily on human experience or domain knowledge. In recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning technology, the classification performance of HAR based on deep learning networks has increased substantially [4,5]. Compared with traditional methods, deep learning networks can automatically extract high-dimensional features from raw sensor inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%