2021 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology With ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ectidamtncon51128.2021.9425742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Feature Selection and Classification for Human Activity and Fall Recognition using Smartphone Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our benchmark regroups head-to-head 17 articles (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) by sharing their approach concerning the human activity recognition task evaluated on the UniMiB-SHAR dataset. Deep learning was the method of choice in almost every case (21-26, 28-32, 34, 35) to try to achieve state-of-the-art results.…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our benchmark regroups head-to-head 17 articles (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) by sharing their approach concerning the human activity recognition task evaluated on the UniMiB-SHAR dataset. Deep learning was the method of choice in almost every case (21-26, 28-32, 34, 35) to try to achieve state-of-the-art results.…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning was the method of choice in almost every case (21-26, 28-32, 34, 35) to try to achieve state-of-the-art results. Only Vong et al (33) employed a more standard machine learning and feature engineering approach. When choosing deep learning, the focus of studies was split into two parts.…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%