2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of feeding behavior between two different‐sized groups of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui)

Abstract: Group-living animals face intragroup scramble and intergroup contest competitions. Many studies have shown that larger groups bear the costs of intragroup scramble competition, which negatively affects the reproductive success of females. Unlike most primate species, Japanese macaques in the Yakushima coastal forest show increased reproductive success with group size. However, it remains unclear how group size affects the behavior of macaques. The present study examined the effects of group size on the feeding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patches outside of the home range were categorized as the border with dominant groups or subordinate groups (see "Home Range Estimation" in Data Analysis). Kurihara/Hanya DOI: 10.1159/000493574 [Kurihara and Hanya, 2015]. Meanwhile, macaques in the coastal forest did not increase co-feeding with adult males along the border, contrary to our prediction.…”
Section: Variation In Food Patch Use Based On Food Patch Locationcontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patches outside of the home range were categorized as the border with dominant groups or subordinate groups (see "Home Range Estimation" in Data Analysis). Kurihara/Hanya DOI: 10.1159/000493574 [Kurihara and Hanya, 2015]. Meanwhile, macaques in the coastal forest did not increase co-feeding with adult males along the border, contrary to our prediction.…”
Section: Variation In Food Patch Use Based On Food Patch Locationcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…To control for confounding factors, we used the number of co-feeding individuals, patch size, and food type as control variables (Table 2). It has already been established that (1) the duration of feeding in one patch depends on patch size, food type, and the number of co-feeding individuals [Kazahari and Agetsuma, 2008;Chancellor and Isbell, 2009], (2) the frequency of visual scanning depends on the number of co-feeding individuals [Kazahari and Agetsuma, 2010;Suzuki and Sugiura, 2011], and (3) the number of co-feeding individuals depends on patch size and food type [Potts et al, 2011;Kurihara and Hanya, 2015]. Although several studies measured patch quality more precisely (e.g., density of food items within a patch [Kazahari and Agetsuma, 2008]), patch size and food type would be sufficient for controlling ecological characteristics of a patch in the present study.…”
Section: Statistical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Annual and seasonal percentages were obtained by averaging relative monthly values. Following Huang et al [2017] and Kurihara and Hanya [2015], we built generalised linear mixed models to explain locomotion, posture, stratum and substrate use by the langurs and then examined seasonal variations. For this purpose, we set seasons as fixed factors and sample sizes as random factors in the models.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is much more difficult to directly observe scramble competition and measure foraging efficiency [Liu et al, 2013]. Many researchers inferred scramble competition from the significant effect of group size on day range length and time budgets [Dunbar, 1992;Overdorff, 1996;Steenbeek and van Schaik, 2001;Teichroeb et al, 2003;Snaith and Chapman, 2005;Fashing et al, 2007;Saj and Sicotte, 2007;Isbell, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Fan et al, 2015;Kurihara and Hanya, 2015]. The ecological constraints model proposes that intragroup feeding competition should increase as group size increases, and the larger groups should travel further and spend more time moving and/or feeding, and/or less time resting than smaller groups [Janson, 1988;Wrangham et al, 1993;Chapman et al, 1995;Chapman and Chapman, 2000;Chapman and Pavelka, 2005;Teichroeb and Sicotte, 2009;Liu et al, 2013;Gogarten et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%