2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02593-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fetal and adult tympanic membrane sizes: a cadaveric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leibovitz et al 3 stated that the TRH and TRW corresponded to the vertical (height) and horizontal (width) diameters of the tympanic membrane, respectively ( Table 5 ). 15 - 20 Beger et al 20 compared the tympanic membrane dimensions of 18 fetuses (24.27 ± 3.24 weeks) and 10 adults (75.70 ± 14.11 years), and found that the membrane diameters did not alter from the seventh month in utero, in accordance with this work (which showed that the parameters of the TR did not change from the seventh month). The literature data focused on the tympanic membrane diameters ( Table 5 ) displayed that the numerical values were different in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Leibovitz et al 3 stated that the TRH and TRW corresponded to the vertical (height) and horizontal (width) diameters of the tympanic membrane, respectively ( Table 5 ). 15 - 20 Beger et al 20 compared the tympanic membrane dimensions of 18 fetuses (24.27 ± 3.24 weeks) and 10 adults (75.70 ± 14.11 years), and found that the membrane diameters did not alter from the seventh month in utero, in accordance with this work (which showed that the parameters of the TR did not change from the seventh month). The literature data focused on the tympanic membrane diameters ( Table 5 ) displayed that the numerical values were different in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Measurements of fixed and/or preserved tissues are commonly used in morphological sciences (Waltenberger et al, 2021). For developmental and foetal anatomy, formaldehyde‐preserved research material is the main source for morphological analysis (Beger et al, 2021; Grzonkowska et al, 2021; Paruszewska‐Achtel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%