2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the broad application of AnMBR is limited by several key factors, of which the membrane fouling is one of the most important issues (Ahmed et al, 2012;Meng et al, 2017). Different methods have been explored for membrane fouling mitigation in AnMBR, such as novel membrane materials (Jeong et al, 2018), chemical cleaning and new mode of operation (Lew et al, 2009). However, many of these methods show low efficiency for mitigation of biofilm formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the broad application of AnMBR is limited by several key factors, of which the membrane fouling is one of the most important issues (Ahmed et al, 2012;Meng et al, 2017). Different methods have been explored for membrane fouling mitigation in AnMBR, such as novel membrane materials (Jeong et al, 2018), chemical cleaning and new mode of operation (Lew et al, 2009). However, many of these methods show low efficiency for mitigation of biofilm formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceramic membranes proved to be an effective and reliable MBR component, leading to higher treatment efficiencies of COD, ammonium, and phosphorus elimination [84,85]. In addition, higher treatment performance in terms of COD and MLSS removal, more stable operation and less transmembrane pressure (TMP) increase was exhibited by the MBR with ceramic modules, compared to the system with the polymeric units [86]. Lower TMP increase, higher removal of non-purgeable organic compounds and lower UV absorbance of the permeate was demonstrated by Hofs et al [87] in relation to the surface water samples being treated by ceramic modules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, even if larger than the pore, soft particles are able to pass through the membrane by deforming and deswelling. Such foulants are common in several industrial applications, e.g., wastewater treatment and emulsion filtration [ 117 , 118 ]. The behavior of a soft microgel in a microfluidic filtration system and in a centrifugation one was investigated by de Aguiar et al [ 119 ].…”
Section: Fouling: Stages and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%