2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five dermal substitutes in full-thickness skin wound healing in a porcine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
72
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…6,23,24 However, an ideal skin graft material has yet to be developed. 2 Allogeneic or xenograft materials can elicit clinical challenges such as rejection, contraction, bleeding and infection, scar formation, and poor tissue formation, 1,2 whereas synthetic skin substitutes often lack sufficient biologic information for effective scaffold integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,23,24 However, an ideal skin graft material has yet to be developed. 2 Allogeneic or xenograft materials can elicit clinical challenges such as rejection, contraction, bleeding and infection, scar formation, and poor tissue formation, 1,2 whereas synthetic skin substitutes often lack sufficient biologic information for effective scaffold integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,[16][17][18] Another advantage of this model is that due to its size, larger wounds can be created than in the other models. 19 This mimics more closely the clinical situation of a large burn. However, the Yorkshire/Large White pig does not develop scar tissue akin to humans, 13 and longterm studies have not revealed significant effects on contraction.…”
Section: Wound Contraction In Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Yorkshire/Large White pig does not develop scar tissue akin to humans, 13 and longterm studies have not revealed significant effects on contraction. 19 Although the advantages and drawbacks of the animal models used in this field are apparent, a wealth of information on the physiological and biological response to therapies can be gained from using these models in experimental settings closely mimicking the clinical situation. The limitations of in vitro studies mean that the complexity of vascularity, immune function, tissue durability, and host interaction cannot be adequately replicated experimentally.…”
Section: Wound Contraction In Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, BM group is an innovative association showed in this study, and its results are promising. MDM offer a structure that allows for both cell migration and neovascularization 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%