2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.56.3.031223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of flash lidar detector options

Abstract: Abstract. Three lidar receiver technologies using the total laser energy required to perform a set of imaging tasks are compared. The tasks are combinations of two collection types (3-D mapping from near and far), two scene types (foliated and unobscured), and three types of data products (geometry only, geometry plus 3-bit intensity, and geometry plus 6-bit intensity). The receiver technologies are based on Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes (GMAPD), linear mode avalanche photodiodes (LMAPD), and optical time-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, flash lidars have proven to be useful in specific applications such as tactical military imaging scenarios where both the sensor platform and the target move during the image capture, a situation also common in vehicles. Other advantages include the elimination of scanning optics and moving elements and potential for creating a miniaturized system [80,81]. This has resulted in the existence of systems based on flash lidars effectively being commercialized at present in the automotive market [82].…”
Section: (A) Flash Imagersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, flash lidars have proven to be useful in specific applications such as tactical military imaging scenarios where both the sensor platform and the target move during the image capture, a situation also common in vehicles. Other advantages include the elimination of scanning optics and moving elements and potential for creating a miniaturized system [80,81]. This has resulted in the existence of systems based on flash lidars effectively being commercialized at present in the automotive market [82].…”
Section: (A) Flash Imagersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEMS sensors use the mirror to transmit the laser in the same way as scanning sensors, but the mirror is operated vertically, horizontally, or in all directions [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Flash sensors transmit one large-area laser, such as with a digital camera, and receive the laser reflected by the object in an array sensor, which is expressed in one frame [ 20 , 21 ]. OPA sensors use a method in which an optical phase modulator controls a phase of the laser through the lens and transmits the laser in various directions [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, absorption of a single photon in its depletion region may result in an avalanche breakdown and a digital-like signal. 15 With recent advances in integrated single photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD), this approach has shown great potential in three-dimensional (3D) imaging, especially in near-range applications. 16 However, dark current and background-induced noise, which may completely block the receiver, is a problem in receivers of this type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linear detection mode, the photodetector, which is usually an APD or PIN, is biased below the breakdown voltage and produces current pulses proportional to the received optical power. 15,19 In these receivers, the background illumination does not block signal detection but instead adds extra noise to the input of the receiver. The dominant noise source, especially at low signal levels, is nevertheless the noise due to the receiver electronics itself, which defines the limit of sensitivity in many cases, especially around 900-nm wavelength region where the dark current noise of the APD is lower than 1550-nm wavelength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%