2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At our institution, FOLFIRINOX is often offered to patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, whereas gemcitabine-based therapy is often offered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Recently, the first cross-institutional retrospective study across 388 centers in the USA ( n = 1102) showed that FOLFIRINOX was associated with more than 2 months of survival advantage over gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in this subgroup of pancreatic cancer [ 12 ]. A recent meta-analysis showed no significant difference between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At our institution, FOLFIRINOX is often offered to patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, whereas gemcitabine-based therapy is often offered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Recently, the first cross-institutional retrospective study across 388 centers in the USA ( n = 1102) showed that FOLFIRINOX was associated with more than 2 months of survival advantage over gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in this subgroup of pancreatic cancer [ 12 ]. A recent meta-analysis showed no significant difference between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a cross-trial comparison suggested better efficacy but more neutropenia with the FOLFIRINOX regimen, there are no published randomized trials in the metastatic setting directly compared FOLFIRINOX to GEM-NabP. However, a meta-analysis [22] and a multicenter retrospective study [23] comparing first-line FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NabP regimens in metastatic PDAC demonstrated improved survival with FOLFIRINOX. Furthermore, FOLFIRINOX was associated with fewer post-treatment hospitalizations and lower post-treatment costs.…”
Section: Metastatic Pdacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other benefits of chemotherapy also include the expansion of the resectable population, reduction of tumor burden, control of occult metastases and prevention of recurrence/metastasis. (Neoadjuvant) FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9-and 2.0-month improvement in survival compared with (neoadjuvant) AG for resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, respectively [6,7]. These chemotherapeutic drugs exert anticancer effects by damaging DNA and RNA and inhibiting thymidylate synthase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%