2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13111547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Forecasting Models for Real-Time Monitoring of Water Quality Parameters Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Neural Networks

Abstract: Accurate real-time water quality prediction is of great significance for local environmental managers to deal with upcoming events and emergencies to develop best management practices. In this study, the performances in real-time water quality forecasting based on different deep learning (DL) models with different input data pre-processing methods were compared. There were three popular DL models concerned, including the convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory neural network (LSTM), and hybr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other hybrid machines and deep learning models have been developed for investigating water quality index, for example, one-dimensional residual CNN (1-DRCNN) and bi-directional gated recurrent units (BiGRU) have been utilized for predicting Water Quality in the Luan River [31]. Moreover, a hybrid deep learning model based on the CNN and LSTM model has been applied, tested, and compared for predicting water goodness based on real-time monitoring of water quality variables [32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other hybrid machines and deep learning models have been developed for investigating water quality index, for example, one-dimensional residual CNN (1-DRCNN) and bi-directional gated recurrent units (BiGRU) have been utilized for predicting Water Quality in the Luan River [31]. Moreover, a hybrid deep learning model based on the CNN and LSTM model has been applied, tested, and compared for predicting water goodness based on real-time monitoring of water quality variables [32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sha et al [99] evaluated various DL approaches such as CNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM models. Moreover, they employed a complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition algorithm (EEMD) with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) to decompose and reduce the intricacy of DO and TN concentration.…”
Section: Hybridisation Of Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the initial stage of water quality forecasting research, nonmechanical water quality forecasting methods have emerged. The theoretical bases of non‐mechanical water quality forecasting methods include regression, time sequence analysis, gray forecasting, and neural networks (Sha et al, 2021). Khan and Valeo (2015) proposed a fuzzy linear regression model to forecast the dissolved oxygen content of a river in Calgary, Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%