2016
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Four Bleeding Risk Scores to Identify Rivaroxaban‐treated Patients With Venous Thromboembolism at Low Risk for Major Bleeding

Abstract: ObjectivesOutpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) requires the selection of patients with a low risk of bleeding during the first few weeks of anticoagulation. The accuracy of four systems, originally derived for predicting bleeding in VTE treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), was assessed in VTE patients treated with rivaroxaban.MethodsAll patients treated with rivaroxaban in the multinational EINSTEIN deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) trials were included. Major b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 In efforts to improve the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DVT, multiple scoring methodologies have been developed such as the Well's score, and these take into account clinical as well as historical variables. 14,15 Ultimately, VDU represents the most sensitive and specific modality for the diagnosis of DVT in the lower extremities. 2 The performance of venous duplex has been standardized by various accrediting bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 In efforts to improve the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DVT, multiple scoring methodologies have been developed such as the Well's score, and these take into account clinical as well as historical variables. 14,15 Ultimately, VDU represents the most sensitive and specific modality for the diagnosis of DVT in the lower extremities. 2 The performance of venous duplex has been standardized by various accrediting bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bleeding events will be further characterised as major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, using published criteria, further defined in the guidance document and using previously established criteria according to guidelines published by ISTH. 1 31 …”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 30-day incidence of major bleeding was <1.0% in both the AMPLIFY and EINSTEIN trials, and for patients with low risk of bleeding, the rate can be expected to be about 0.5% with upper limit 95% CI <1.00. 1 Additionally, in 2015, the 90-day incidence of the composite rate for VTE recurrence and major bleeding reported in systematic reviews and meta analyses of outcomes of low-risk patients with VTE diagnosed in the ED and treated at home with VKAs was 18/785 (2.2%, 95% CI 1.4% to 3.6%). 2 den Exter et al randomised 275 patients who were Hestia negative to be treated with VKAs at home; 90-day follow-up identified three patients with recurrent VTE and three with major bleeding (6/275, 2.2%).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 A variety of studies already validated the score and found decent discriminative ability between the 3 bleeding risk categories, but poor to moderate predictive value. 50,53,55,56 Risk Assessment for Extended Anticoagulation Treatment…”
Section: Has-bled Scorementioning
confidence: 99%