2015
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2015.3465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Four Italian Beef Cattle Breeds by Means of Functional Genes

Abstract: Piemontese, Chianina, Marchigiana and Romagnola are the main Italian beef breeds, and the quality of their products is largely recognised all over the world. Here, 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 12 candidate genes involved on meat traits were investigated on 1055 candidates for selection in order to analyse the within-and betweenbreed variability with a functional marker approach. Three SNPs (GDF8-3, GH and NPY-3) were monomorphic and most of the polymorphic SNPs showed an allele distribution qui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the F-statistics, H o and H e for each Italian beef cattle breed are shown in Table 2. The overall heterozygosity among breeds (H o = 0.367, H e = 0.368) was comparable to that reported for the same breeds in a previous study using few SNPs in candidate genes (Lasagna et al, 2015). The H o and H e were lower for the more highly improved CHI (0.360 and 0.356), MAR (0.350 and 0.350) and ROM (0.343 and 0.350) than for heritage POD (0.399 and 0.390) and MRM (0.383 and 0.390) breeds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results of the F-statistics, H o and H e for each Italian beef cattle breed are shown in Table 2. The overall heterozygosity among breeds (H o = 0.367, H e = 0.368) was comparable to that reported for the same breeds in a previous study using few SNPs in candidate genes (Lasagna et al, 2015). The H o and H e were lower for the more highly improved CHI (0.360 and 0.356), MAR (0.350 and 0.350) and ROM (0.343 and 0.350) than for heritage POD (0.399 and 0.390) and MRM (0.383 and 0.390) breeds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The H o and H e were lower for the more highly improved CHI (0.360 and 0.356), MAR (0.350 and 0.350) and ROM (0.343 and 0.350) than for heritage POD (0.399 and 0.390) and MRM (0.383 and 0.390) breeds. The average F IS value was relatively low for CHI, ROM, MRM and POD, indicating a positive effect of controlled genetic inbreeding in the breeds (Lasagna et al, 2015), whereas it was slightly positive for MAR (0.005). The low values of heterozygosity and the high inbreeding of MAR compared with other breeds, are attributable to the extensive use of small number of improved bulls (Maretto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Italy, the first meat that received the Protected Geographical Indication from the European Community was the “white beef of the Central Apennines” ( 1 ), which includes fresh meat from the three cattle breeds in central Italy: Chianina, Marchigiana, and Romagnola, which are, together with Piemontese, the main specialized breeds for meat production in Italy, and the quality of their products is widely recognized all over the world ( 2 ). In particular, Marchigiana husbandry techniques involve pasture in the summer and a stalling period during winter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of feed rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids represents an innovation and enhancement in the breeding methods of typical local breeds such as Marchigiana, Chianina and Romagnola, in Italy. The husbandry techniques for the Marchigiana breed plan a diet rich in cereal-based feed during the finishing period [14]. For this reason, it could be interesting to add feed that can enrich beef meat with PUFAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%