1979
DOI: 10.2527/jas1979.4851033x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Four Levels of Protein Supplementation with and without Oral Des on Reproductive Traits and Testosterone of Bulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No effect of the DES treatment was observed on the levels of the androgens. This was contrary to a study in which there was a very small increase in the concentration of testosterone [38]. Since the observations are derived from only one animal treated with DES, more animal studies must be performed to confirm the observed results.…”
Section: Diethylstilbestrol Administrationcontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…No effect of the DES treatment was observed on the levels of the androgens. This was contrary to a study in which there was a very small increase in the concentration of testosterone [38]. Since the observations are derived from only one animal treated with DES, more animal studies must be performed to confirm the observed results.…”
Section: Diethylstilbestrol Administrationcontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The comparison of scrotal circumferences within the breed becomes more difficult as (i) the scrotal circumference is influenced by the age, the liveweight and even the maternal age (Coulter and Foote 1977;Martin et al 1979;Diaz and Mandlhate 1983;Lunstra et al 1988;Alencar et al 1989;Morris et al 1989); (ii) the abundant nutrition supply (e.g. 135% of the Total Dietary Nutrients (TDN)) increases the scrotal circumference (Seidel et al 1980); (iii) it is justifiable to take into consideration seasonal changes which also exist, because the scrotal circumference (correlation r = -0.22 and r = -0.38) is connected with the length of the day and the average daily temperature; and (iv) the size of the scrotal circumference, according to previous results (Swanepoel and Heyns 1990), is influenced considerably more by the rate of growth before weaning than thereafter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%